Microsoft Teams is a default choice for many organizations, but it’s not always the best fit. Its tight integration with Microsoft 365, heavy UI, and rigid structure often slow down agile teams that rely on async workflows or non-Microsoft tools.
As more companies adopt distributed models and prioritize clarity over constant pings, Teams' limitations become harder to ignore. From startup ops to client-facing teams, the need for lighter, more flexible collaboration tools is clear.
Whether you are managing a remote-first product team, scaling internal operations, or coordinating across time zones, these Microsoft Teams alternatives offer cleaner interfaces, stronger async features, and better alignment with modern team workflows in 2025.
Top Microsoft Teams Alternatives Compared for 2025
As remote work matures and team structures evolve, Microsoft Teams is no longer the default for fast-moving, async-friendly collaboration. In 2025, organizations are shifting to tools with lighter interfaces, stronger async support, and fewer Microsoft 365 dependencies.
Below is a side-by-side comparison of top Microsoft Teams alternatives, including who they’re built for, how they work, and what they cost:
Platform | Best For | Platform Support | Core Features | Pricing Model |
---|---|---|---|---|
8seats | Async-first team collaboration | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Rooms, Tables, 8AI assistant, Subject DMs | Free (up to 8 users), Paid per seat |
Slack | Fast-paced teams, dev-heavy workflows | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Channels, Workflow Builder, App integrations | Freemium |
Lark | All-in-one remote work suite | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Docs, Calendar, Chat, Video, Email | Free + Paid plans |
Flock | Lightweight chat with built-in tools | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Polls, Tasks, Video calls, Reminders | Freemium |
Rocket.Chat | Privacy-focused, self-hosted setups | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | E2E encryption, LDAP auth, API, federation | Free (self-hosted), Paid plans |
Chanty | Small teams that need simple workflows | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Team chat, Task board, Threaded messaging | Freemium |
Zoho Cliq | Teams inside the Zoho ecosystem | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Bots, Commands, Multi-tab view | Freemium |
Mattermost | DevSecOps and regulated industries | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Self-hosting, CLI tools, Compliance features | Paid (Pro/Enterprise) |
Webex | Video-first hybrid communication | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Meetings, Whiteboards, Messaging | Free + Paid plans |
Google Chat | Google Workspace users | iOS, Android, Web, Desktop | Spaces, Threads, Meet integration | Included in Google Workspace tiers |
1. 8seats: Top Free Tier for Structured, AI-Assisted Collaboration

8seats is built for async-first teams that need structure without friction. Unlike Teams’ linear chats and tool sprawl, 8seats organizes work into Rooms (topics and large groups), Tables (tasks and team spaces), and Subject DMs (focused 1:1 threads up to 8 people) that replace emails. Every message stays anchored to context, not lost in noise.
Its AI assistant, 8AI, summarizes discussions, helps workers find solutions together, and keeps your team aligned, available even on the free tier. With no required email signup and fast onboarding, 8seats is ideal for lean, remote teams that need clarity, speed, and zero-overhead collaboration.
Key Features
Rooms for topic-based or company-wide discussions and announcements
Tables to discuss tasks and communicate with a team
Subject DMs to keep topic specific conversations from 1:1, up to 8 people on track
Built-in 8AI assistant for summaries and team collaboration
Pros
Async-native design reduces noise and distractions
Fast, no-email sign-up and onboarding
Lightweight, modern UX for busy teams
AI clarity tools built into the free plan
Cons
No native video calling (requires third-party tools)
Smaller app ecosystem (by design)
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features & Limits |
---|---|---|
Free | $0 (up to 8 users) | 3 Rooms, 3 Tables, 8AI, unlimited DMs |
Business | From $4.70/user/month (AUD) | Unlimited Rooms/Tables, up to 10,000 users, full AI access |
Rating
Review Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
Capterra | 4.7/5 |
2. Flock: Lightweight Chat with Built-in Productivity Tools

Flock offers a clean, low-friction alternative to Microsoft Teams for small to mid-sized teams that want messaging, tasks, and video in one place, without the enterprise bloat. It combines real-time chat with integrated tools like polls, to-dos, and reminders, so teams stay aligned without switching apps.
Its simple UX, fast setup, and tight Google Workspace integration make it ideal for distributed teams that prioritize ease of use over deep customization. Flock is built for productivity without complexity.
Key Features
Group and 1:1 chat with public/private channels
Built-in task manager with reminders
Polls and native video calling
Google Calendar and Drive integrations
Pros
Fast learning curve, minimal setup
Combines chat and lightweight task tracking
Clean, focused interface
Works well for hybrid and remote teams
Cons
Fewer integrations than Slack or Teams
UI feels dated on mobile devices
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features & Limits |
---|---|---|
Free | $0/user/month | 10K message history, 1:1 & group messaging, 5GB team storage |
Pro | $6/user/month | Unlimited history, 10GB/user, 24/7 priority support |
Enterprise | Contact sales | Advanced admin controls, dedicated account manager, SLA-backed support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.4/5 |
Capterra | 4.5/5 |
TrustRadius | 9.4/10 |
3. Slack: Real-Time Messaging Built for Workflow Speed

Slack is the go-to alternative to Microsoft Teams for teams that move fast and depend on real-time communication. It’s built around channels, not meetings, so updates, decisions, and workflows stay visible and searchable without creating email chains or calendar bloat.
With thousands of integrations and a powerful Workflow Builder, Slack seamlessly integrates into complex tech stacks, making it ideal for development teams, product squads, and startup operations. It doesn’t try to replace your stack; it connects it.
Key Features
Public and private channels for structured team messaging
Workflow Builder to automate approvals and routine tasks
Slack Huddles for lightweight voice calls
2,600+ app integrations for DevOps, HR, finance, and more
Pros
Intuitive, highly responsive UI
Deep integration ecosystem (GitHub, Google Drive, Jira, etc.)
Scales from 5-person teams to global orgs
Reliable, enterprise-grade infrastructure
Cons
Expensive at scale (especially for large orgs)
Message history limited on free tier
Less effective for async-heavy teams
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features & Limits |
---|---|---|
Free | $0 | 90-day history, 10 integrations, 1:1 huddles |
Pro | $4.38/user/month | Unlimited history, group huddles, Slack AI, screen sharing; per-seat pricing, no external guests |
Business+ | $9/user/month | SSO, compliance exports, 24/7 support; requires annual billing for the discount |
Enterprise Grid | Custom pricing | Org-wide channels, advanced admin tools, priority support; requires sales contact |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.5/5 |
Capterra | 4.7/5 |
TrustRadius | 9.0/10 |
4. Lark: All-in-One Suite for Remote Teams and Creators

Lark merges chat, video, docs, calendar, and email into a single platform, ideal for teams that want fewer tools, not more integrations. Unlike Microsoft Teams, which often splits workflows across separate apps, Lark keeps everything in one clean, modern interface.
It’s especially useful for remote-first teams, global startups, and creator-led businesses that value collaboration across time zones. With generous free storage, built-in scheduling, and multilingual support, Lark removes friction for hybrid teams without sacrificing features.
Key Features
Shared Docs and Sheets with real-time editing
Smart Calendar integrated with chat and meetings
Group and direct chat with video conferencing
Built-in email client with Gmail/Outlook support
Pros
Unified workspace reduces context switching
Generous free tier (storage + participants)
Multilingual UI and global-ready toolset
Smooth UX across mobile and desktop
Cons
Limited app marketplace
Admin tools not as advanced as Slack or Teams
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Starter | $0/user/month | 200GB storage/team, 500-person calls, chat, docs, calendar, email |
Pro | $14.40/user/month | 1TB storage/team, workflow automation, advanced permissions |
Enterprise | Contact sales | Unlimited storage, data residency, security policies, dedicated support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.5/5 |
Capterra | 4.4/5 |
TrustRadius | 9.9/10 |
5. WebEx: Video-First Communication for Hybrid Teams

Webex is purpose-built for teams that rely on high-quality video communication but don’t need a full collaboration suite. While Microsoft Teams blends meetings with chat and document workflows, Webex focuses on video performance, reliability, and secure client-facing interactions.
It’s a strong fit for hybrid organizations, service teams, and external stakeholders where smooth meetings and encryption matter more than internal task tracking. WebEx’s free tier supports up to 100 participants, making it viable for startups and mid-sized teams.
Key Features
HD video meetings with screen sharing and reactions
Interactive whiteboards for collaboration
End-to-end encrypted messaging
No-download guest access for external participants
Pros
Enterprise-grade video stability and uptime
Built-in security and encryption protocols
Easy guest access; no login or install needed
Strong performance for external meetings
Cons
Basic chat lacks structure and threading
Interface feels slower than lighter tools
Pricing
Pricing | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Free | $0/user/month | 40-minute meetings, 100 participants, messaging, screen sharing |
Meet | $14.50/user/month | 24-hour meetings, 200 participants, 10GB cloud storage |
Suite | $25/user/month | 300 participants, webinars, polling, 100GB storage, advanced security |
Enterprise | Contact sales | 1,000+ participants, compliance features, dedicated support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.3/5 |
Capterra | 4.4/5 |
TrustRadius | 8.5/10 |
6. Rocket.Chat: Open-Source Messaging for Privacy-Driven Teams

Rocket.Chat is a leading Microsoft Teams alternative for organizations that need full control over data, hosting, and compliance. Unlike SaaS tools locked into third-party clouds, Rocket.Chat gives you complete ownership through on-premise or private cloud deployments.
It’s especially effective for healthcare, finance, government, and education industries where self-hosting, API flexibility, and security certifications are non-negotiable. Rocket.Chat’s open-source model also means full customization without license restrictions.
Key Features
Self-hosted or cloud deployments with full data control
End-to-end encryption and audit-ready security tools
LDAP, OAuth, and SSO authentication options
API-first design for integrations and workflow automation
Pros
Total ownership over infrastructure and data
Strong compliance support (HIPAA, ISO, GDPR)
Custom branding and plugin support
No per-user licensing for self-hosted plans
Cons
Technical setup and maintenance required
UI is less polished than commercial platforms
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Starter | $0 (self-hosted) | Unlimited chat, threads, E2E encryption, 2FA, content moderation, DLP |
Pro | $4/user/month | Premium hosting, white-labeling, standard support |
Enterprise | Contact sales | Guest access, VoIP, privacy-first AI, audit logs, SLA-backed support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.2/5 |
Capterra | 4.3/5 |
7. Chanty: Simpler Collaboration for Small Business Teams

Chanty is a lightweight Microsoft Teams alternative built for small teams that need basic communication and task management without complexity. It combines team chat with a built-in Kanban board, making it easy to move from conversation to action.
For freelancers, startups, and service-based teams, Chanty offers just enough structure to stay aligned, without overloading users with enterprise features or steep learning curves.
Key Features
Team chat with unlimited searchable history
Built-in task manager with Kanban board view
Threaded messaging for context clarity
1:1 audio and video calls included
Pros
Clean, distraction-free interface
Forever-free tier with full chat history
Built-in productivity tools without external apps
Fast mobile app and simple onboarding
Cons
Limited integrations compared to Slack or Teams
Admin controls and user roles are basic
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Free | $0 | Unlimited messages, 20GB storage, task board, 1:1 calls |
Business | $4/user/month | Unlimited users, roles & permissions, group calls, priority support |
Enterprise | Contact sales | SSO, SAML, compliance features, white-labeling, dedicated CSM |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.6/5 |
Capterra | 4.7/5 |
8. Zoho Cliq: Budget-Friendly Collaboration Inside the Zoho Ecosystem

Zoho Cliq is a smart pick for teams already using Zoho apps or those looking for an affordable alternative to Microsoft Teams. It blends real-time chat, voice/video calls, and automation, while staying lightweight and cost-effective.
Unlike Teams, which can feel rigid outside Microsoft’s stack, Zoho Cliq fits naturally into broader workflows across Zoho CRM, Projects, and Books. It’s built for SMBs that want integrated tools without ballooning costs.
Key Features
Real-time chat with multi-conversation tab view
Native audio/video calls and screen sharing
Slash commands and bots for automation
Deep integration with Zoho’s full suite of business tools
Pros
Seamless inside the Zoho ecosystem
Highly affordable pricing tiers
Strong permissions and access controls
Easy to scale without third-party add-ons
Cons
Limited functionality outside the Zoho ecosystem
Smaller third-party integration library
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Free | $0/user/month | Messaging, file sharing, chat export, remote work tools |
Standard | $1/user/month | External channels, custom domains, call recording |
Professional | $2/user/month | Task management, IP restrictions, bulk import |
Enterprise | $4/user/month | DLP, branded meetings, advanced usage reports |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.4/5 |
Capterra | 4.6/5 |
TrustRadius | 9.2/10 |
9. Mattermost: Secure Collaboration for DevSecOps and Regulated Teams

Mattermost is built for technical teams that need full control over workflows, infrastructure, and data. Unlike Microsoft Teams, which enforces cloud hosting and limited customization, Mattermost supports self-hosting, private cloud, and compliance-focused environments.
It’s ideal for DevSecOps, finance, government, and healthcare teams that require high-security standards, role-based permissions, and integrations with developer toolchains. If you need flexibility without vendor lock-in, Mattermost delivers.
Key Features
On-premise or private cloud deployment
CLI tools and DevOps-ready integrations
Role-based access control and audit logs
Channel-based messaging with threads and file sharing
Pros
Enterprise-grade security and compliance (FIPS, FedRAMP)
Full customization through APIs, plugins, and theming
Seamless integrations with GitHub, Jenkins, Jira, and CI/CD tools
Built to scale in complex, regulated environments
Cons
Requires technical resources for setup and maintenance
Interface is less intuitive for non-technical users
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Professional | $10/user/month | Channel chat, custom branding, audio calls, 3M post search limit |
Enterprise | Custom pricing | Guest access, VoIP, screen sharing, advanced controls, SLA support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.3/5 |
Capterra | 4.4/5 |
TrustRadius | 8.8/10 |
10. Google Chat: Lightweight, Workspace-Native Messaging

Google Chat is the natural fit for teams already operating inside Google Workspace. It offers streamlined messaging, built-in Meet access, and native integration with Gmail, Docs, Calendar, and Drive without adding complexity.
Unlike Microsoft Teams, which can feel heavy and overly structured, Google Chat keeps communication simple and fast. It’s ideal for smaller teams, startups, or departments that prioritize ease of use and tight integration with their existing Google stack.
Key Features
Spaces for team-based messaging with threaded replies
Direct Meet integration for instant video calls
Seamless file sharing via Google Drive
AI-powered chat suggestions and smart replies
Pros
Fully integrated with Gmail, Calendar, and Docs
Fast onboarding, no training required
Clean, mobile-friendly interface
Secure and managed within Google Admin console
Cons
Only available with paid Google Workspace plans
Limited third-party app ecosystem
Fewer advanced features for large or regulated teams
Pricing
Plan | Cost | Key Features |
---|---|---|
Starter | $7.56/user/month | Chat, Gmail, Meet, 100-participant video calls, 30GB storage, basic support |
Standard | $15.12/user/month | 150 participants, meeting recordings, shared drives, 2TB storage |
Plus | $26.40/user/month | 500 participants, attendance tracking, 5TB storage, eDiscovery |
Enterprise | Contact sales | S/MIME, DLP, data regions, enterprise compliance and support |
Rating
Platform | Average Rating |
---|---|
G2 | 4.6/5 |
Capterra | 4.5/5 |
TrustRadius | 8.0/10 |
Looking to switch from Google Chat to simpler communication tools? Have a look at these Google Chat alternatives!
Why Do Teams Switch from Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams works well if you are fully invested in Microsoft 365 and need tightly coupled apps. But for many teams, especially those operating across tools like Google Workspace, Notion, or GitHub, Teams adds friction instead of removing it.
The platform’s rigid structure, heavy UI, and meeting-first design make it harder for async teams, startups, and hybrid workforces to stay aligned. As work shifts toward flexibility, Microsoft Teams often feels like a system built for yesterday’s office, not today’s agile workflows.
Key reasons organizations make the switch:
Overhead from Microsoft 365 lock-in: Core features depend on Office integration, which limits flexibility for mixed-tool environments.
Poor async support: Teams pushes real-time meetings over structured, asynchronous collaboration.
Cluttered interface: Navigation, settings, and chat organization are unintuitive for many users.
Limited control in smaller orgs: Admin settings are often too complex or inaccessible for lean teams.
Slow adoption curve: New users face a steeper learning curve than with lighter alternatives.
Missed context in threads: Conversations get buried, and message history is difficult to scan quickly.
MS Teams isn't being phased out, but it's no longer the best fit for everyone. As work becomes more distributed, tools that offer clarity, flexibility, and cross-tool integration are replacing it across industries.
How to Choose the Right Microsoft Teams Alternative
Choosing the right collaboration tool comes down to how your team works, not just which features look good on paper. Microsoft Teams is one-size-fits-all, but today’s teams need platforms that match their speed, structure, and scale.
Whether you're leading a fast-moving product team, running internal ops, or managing external clients, the right alternative should reduce overhead, not add to it. Below is a clear breakdown to help you evaluate options based on what actually matters.

Considerations for Free Microsoft Teams Alternative Tools
Criteria | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Async-first features | Keeps discussions focused without forcing meetings or constant check-ins |
User limits per plan | Helps your team grow without hitting usage walls too early |
Storage & file sharing | Critical for teams handling docs, assets, or ongoing project files |
Mobile/Desktop apps | Ensures access across devices, especially for remote or on-the-go teams |
Built-in task tracking | Saves you from relying on third-party tools just to manage daily workflows |
Key Factors for Paid Microsoft Teams Alternatives Tool
Criteria | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Advanced integrations | Supports full-stack operations across tools like CRM, dev, and HR systems |
Custom roles/permissions | Essential for scaling access without compromising security |
Admin & analytics tools | Enables better visibility into usage, activity, and compliance |
SLA-backed support | Critical for teams that can't afford tool downtime or unresolved bugs |
Compliance certifications | Required for industries with regulatory needs (finance, healthcare, legal, etc.) |
Universal Criteria (For Any Plan Tier)
Scalability: Can the platform grow with your team’s structure and workload?
Security: Does it meet your internal standards or industry compliance needs?
User Experience: Will your team actually enjoy using it—or resist adoption?
Interoperability: Does it integrate cleanly with your current tools and workflows?
FAQs About Free & Paid Microsoft Teams Alternatives
What makes 8seats' free plan better than other free Teams alternatives?
8seats' free plan is better than other free Teams alternatives because it offers structured Rooms, Tables, Subject DMs, and no email address for user registration, features most tools lock behind a paywall. It's built for async clarity, not chat overload, and doesn't require Microsoft 365 or IT setup.
What are the best alternatives to Microsoft Teams?
The best alternatives to Microsoft Teams are 8seats for async, structured teams, Slack for fast-moving, integration-heavy workflows, Lark for an all-in-one suite with docs, chat, and calendar, and Mattermost for secure, self-hosted options for regulated industries. Each solves a specific Microsoft Teams pain point, from bloat to compliance gaps.
When should I upgrade from the 8seats free to a paid plan?
Upgrade from 8seats free to a paid plan when your team outgrows 3 Rooms or Tables, admin-level controls, or starts scaling beyond 8 users. The paid tier unlocks full workspace customization and advanced usage limits.
Is Microsoft Teams being replaced in 2025?
No, Microsoft Teams is not being replaced in 2025, but usage is shifting. More teams are replacing Teams with tools that support async work, faster onboarding, and flexible integrations. Platforms like 8seats and Slack are leading that shift in 2025.
Make the Switch: Find the Best Microsoft Teams Alternative for Your Needs
Microsoft Teams still works well for Microsoft-first organizations—but it often slows down teams that need agility, async clarity, or simpler operations.
In 2025, the best collaboration platform depends entirely on how your team operates:
For async-first, lean teams: Use 8seats to stay structured without meetings or chat overload.
For enterprise-scale collaboration: Choose Slack for deep integrations and real-time coordination.
For all-in-one productivity suites: Try Lark to unify docs, chat, and scheduling in one space.
For regulated or self-hosted environments: Mattermost gives you full control over infrastructure and compliance.
Don’t choose based on popularity. Choose based on fit. Test what works. And switch to the tool your team actually wants to use.
Ready to switch? Start by testing a free plan with 8seats. It’s built for async-first teams, easy to adopt, and designed to grow with how your team actually works.