Telegram is a global messaging platform with over 800 million monthly active users. Its speed, group capacity, and bot integration have made it a favorite for personal and community use worldwide.

But Telegram has limitations: it lacks default end-to-end encryption, offers a limited collaboration structure, and its interface becomes cluttered in professional settings. These issues push many users to explore Telegram alternatives that provide more control, privacy, and structure.

Best Telegram Alternatives Compared for 2025

Choosing between Telegram alternatives depends on your communication goals, whether you prioritize privacy, structure, or community management.

The table below compares 15 top alternatives against Telegram’s core limitations, offering a fast, scannable overview of what each platform does differently.

1. 8seats

8seats is a purpose-built Telegram alternative for teams that need structure, clarity, and asynchronous workflows. Unlike Telegram’s real-time chaos, 8seats organizes conversations into Rooms and Tables, making it easier to focus on tasks.

For remote teams overwhelmed by Telegram’s group chats, 8seats creates a calmer, more organized environment tailored to productive communication.

Key Features

• Rooms: Organize discussions by team, client, or department

• Tables: Break down projects into clear, structured collaboration spaces

• Subject DMs: Group private messages by topic to avoid clutter

• 8AI Summaries: Automatically highlight key points from conversations

Pros

• Clear separation of conversations by purpose and project

• Reduced noise with only relevant, minimal notifications

• No pressure for real-time replies; perfect for async workflows

• Designed for remote, distributed teams from the ground up

• Built-in AI improves clarity and saves time on catch-up

Cons

• No native video calling; requires third-party integrations

• Smaller app ecosystem compared to mainstream platforms

Pricing & Rating

2. Signal

*Image from Signal

Signal is the gold standard for secure communication, especially when comparing Telegram and Signal in terms of privacy. It uses default end-to-end encryption, doesn’t store metadata, and is maintained by a non-profit with no commercial interests. Unlike Telegram, Signal doesn't support communities or bots, focusing purely on private 1:1 and group messaging.

Key Features

• Default end-to-end encryption for all messages and calls

• No metadata collection, even Signal can’t see your conversations

• Fully open-source protocol, regularly audited for transparency

• Self-destructing messages for added privacy control

Pros

• Industry-leading privacy with zero data retention

• Lightweight app performance across all platforms

• Funded by donations; no ads, no tracking

• Widely trusted by journalists, whistleblowers, and activists

• Encrypted voice and video calling built in

Cons

• Requires a phone number to register and use

• Lacks advanced features like channels, bots, or community spaces

Pricing & Rating

3. WhatsApp

*Image from WhatsApp

WhatsApp is the most widely adopted messaging app and a common point of comparison in the Telegram vs. WhatsApp debate. It utilizes the same Signal protocol for encryption, but stores more metadata and is owned by Meta, which raises concerns about its privacy.

Telegram supports larger-scale groups and channels, whereas WhatsApp is geared towards personal messaging and private sharing.

Key Features

• End-to-end encryption powered by the Signal Protocol

• Voice and video calling with high reliability

• Status updates and efficient media compression

• Cross-device syncing between mobile and desktop

Pros

• Massive global user base, nearly universal adoption

• Simple onboarding for friends, family, and teams

• Highly reliable message delivery and uptime

• Secure encryption for personal chats and calls

• User-friendly interface with minimal learning curve

Cons

• Owned by Meta, with ongoing metadata collection concerns

• No support for usernames, bots, or large-scale public channels

Pricing & Rating

4. Element (Matrix)

*Image from Element

Element is a secure messaging app built on the open Matrix protocol, ideal for users and organizations seeking full control over their data. Unlike Telegram’s centralized infrastructure, Element supports federation, self-hosting, and cross-platform interoperability.

It’s a go-to choice for tech-savvy teams, privacy advocates, and governments who prioritize encryption, transparency, and open standards.

Key Features

• Matrix-based protocol supporting decentralized communication

• End-to-end encrypted rooms for private, secure messaging

• Self-hosting options or access to public servers

• Bridging capabilities to integrate with Slack, IRC, and others

• Fully open-source with granular data ownership and control

Pros

• Full data sovereignty; host your own server or choose your provider

• Scalable for small teams to large organizations

• No vendor lock-in or reliance on Big Tech infrastructure

• Supports regulatory compliance via custom hosting setups

• Widely used by governments, public institutions, and open-source communities

Cons

• Steep learning curve for non-technical users

• Requires ongoing maintenance for self-hosted setups

• Limited plug-and-play integrations with mainstream productivity tools

Pricing & Rating

5. Wire

*Image from Wire

Wire is a secure, European-based messaging platform built for both personal and professional use. With full GDPR compliance, end-to-end encryption, and a sleek user interface, it offers a more structured and privacy-conscious alternative to Telegram.

Wire is open-source, supports team collaboration, and is ideal for organizations that prioritize compliance, confidentiality, and data security.

Key Features

• GDPR-compliant architecture hosted in the EU

• End-to-end encryption for messages, voice, and video calls

• Built-in collaboration tools for teams and business workflows

• Multi-device sync with encrypted data storage

• Fully open-source for transparency and auditability

Pros

• Strong privacy framework backed by European data protection laws

• Designed for business, enterprise, and high-trust environments

• Modern, intuitive interface for secure day-to-day use

• Includes secure file sharing, group messaging, and team tools

• Free tier available for individual, non-commercial use

Cons

• Smaller user base compared to mainstream messaging platforms

• Advanced enterprise features may require a paid subscription

Pricing & Rating

6. Threema

*Image from Threema

Threema is a premium, privacy-first alternative to Telegram, offering Swiss-grade data protection and full anonymity. Unlike Telegram, it doesn’t require a phone number, stores zero metadata, and operates fully within the bounds of strict European privacy laws.

Designed for users and businesses who prioritize confidentiality, Threema delivers secure, no-compromise communication, with no reliance on cloud storage or big tech infrastructure.

Key Features

• Anonymous messaging with no SIM, email, or phone number required

• Swiss-based infrastructure under some of the world’s strictest privacy laws

• No tracking or metadata collection, not even contact lists

• Fully open-source and independently security-audited

Pros

• Maximum privacy with zero data footprint

• GDPR-compliant and completely ad-free

• Reliable for both business and private communications

• Works entirely offline; no cloud backups or phone identifiers

• Includes enterprise-level features for secure team collaboration

Cons

• One-time purchase required; no free tier for individuals

• Smaller user community with limited bots, groups, or public features

Pricing & Rating

Note: Free trial available for Threema Work (up to 30 users/30 days)

7. Session

*Image from Session

Session is a decentralized, privacy-maximized messaging app built for users who need total anonymity. Unlike Telegram, Session doesn’t require a phone number or email, doesn’t collect metadata, and routes messages through an onion network for added protection.

While its interface and performance aren’t as smooth as mainstream apps, Session’s is ideal for activists, journalists, and users in censorship-heavy regions where privacy is critical.

Key Features

• Onion-routed messaging for enhanced anonymity

• No phone number or email required for signup

• Fully decentralized network; no central servers or control

• Open-source codebase with cross-platform availability

Pros

• Maximum anonymity with no identifiable data

• Zero metadata storage or user tracking

• Designed for use in restricted or high-surveillance regions

• End-to-end encrypted group and private chats

• Backed by a committed, privacy-first open-source community

Cons

• Slower message delivery due to onion routing

• User interface is less refined compared to mainstream apps

Pricing & Rating

8. Discord

*Image from Discord

Originally built for gamers, Discord has grown into a powerful platform for community building, informal collaboration, and always-on communication. While it lacks end-to-end encryption, it outperforms Telegram in managing large groups and persistent spaces.

With scalable servers, role-based access, and real-time audio channels, Discord is ideal for creators, educators, and teams that value community interaction over rigid structure.

Key Features

• Voice-first channels that stay open for drop-in collaboration

• Threaded text, forums, and role-based access control

• Built-in screen sharing and live streaming for demos and discussions

• Powerful moderation tools, including bots, roles, and permissions

• Cross-platform support with push-to-talk and notification settings

Pros

• Perfect for online communities, creator networks, and learning groups

• Encourages real-time bonding through casual voice channels

• Highly customizable with bots, roles, and third-party integrations

• Supports async Q&A and open discussions via threads and forums

• Free to use with generous features for teams and communities

Cons

• Lacks native tools for structured project or task management

• Can feel too casual or cluttered for formal, business-oriented teams

Pricing & Rating

9. Slack

*Image from Slack

Slack is a business-first communication platform designed for structured, high-efficiency collaboration. Unlike Telegram’s flat message streams, Slack uses threaded channels, deep app integrations, and workflow automation to streamline daily operations.

It’s ideal for teams that rely on multiple tools and need focused, scalable communication, but may feel overly complex for small, informal groups.

Key Features

• Threaded channels to organize conversations by team, topic, or project

• Integrations with 2,600+ business tools, including Google Workspace, Asana, and Salesforce

• Built-in Slackbot for reminders, automations, and custom workflows

• Audio/video huddles with screen sharing for quick team syncs

Pros

• Seamless integration with popular workplace tools

• Structured messaging improves focus and reduces noise

• Scales efficiently from small teams to large enterprises

• Supports automation with no-code workflows and custom bots

• Advanced search for messages, files, and conversations

Cons

• Free plan has limited message history (90-day retention)

• May feel complex for casual users or non-technical teams

Pricing & Rating

10. Microsoft Teams

*Image from MS Teams

Microsoft Teams is a robust collaboration platform tightly integrated with the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. Built for enterprise communication, it combines messaging, meetings, file sharing, and productivity tools into one unified hub.

Unlike Telegram’s informal, open-channel design, MS Teams offers structured conversations and enterprise-level controls, though its complexity may be unnecessary for smaller teams or personal use.

Key Features

• Native integration with Microsoft 365 apps like Word, Excel, and OneDrive

• All-in-one workspace for chat, meetings, files, and calendar events

• Threaded conversations within teams and channels

• Built-in video and audio conferencing with screen sharing

Pros

• Seamless collaboration within the Microsoft ecosystem

• Centralized platform for communication and document management

• Enterprise-grade compliance, security, and admin controls

• Reliable video calling with calendar and Outlook integration

• Ideal for large organizations standardised on Microsoft tools

Cons

• Steeper learning curve compared to simpler tools like Google Chat

• Full functionality requires a Microsoft 365 subscription

Pricing & Rating

11. Viber

*Image from Viber

Viber blends secure messaging with a fun, consumer-friendly interface, making it ideal for casual communication rather than structured team collaboration. It offers end-to-end encryption for 1:1 chats, disappearing messages, and multimedia sharing.

While Telegram leans toward open platforms and large-scale channels, Viber is better suited for everyday personal use, especially in regions where it maintains a strong user base.

Key Features

• End-to-end encrypted 1:1 messaging for private conversations

• Voice and video calling with international VoIP options

• Disappearing messages in private chats for added privacy

• Stickers, GIFs, and interactive features for casual communication

• Public groups and communities for broader social engagement

Pros

• Simple, intuitive interface for users of all ages

• Great for personal messaging and small group chats

• Secure encryption for individual conversations

• Offers low-cost international calling plans

• Popular in Eastern Europe, Asia, and parts of the Middle East

Cons

• End-to-end encryption is not enabled for group chats by default

• Contains ads and sponsored messages in public content

• Limited adoption in Western professional or enterprise settings

Pricing & Rating

Note: Pricing depends on the destination country. Calls to other Viber users are always free of charge.

12. SimpleX Chat

*Image from SimpleX Chat

SimpleX Chat takes privacy to the next level by eliminating persistent identifiers altogether, no usernames, no phone numbers, and no metadata. Instead, it uses ephemeral invite links to establish peer-to-peer connections, making it one of the most secure messaging platforms available.

While SimpleX Chat lacks the community and convenience features of Telegram, it’s ideal for users who prioritize complete anonymity over scalability or usability.

Key Features

• No usernames or phone numbers required for messaging

• Zero metadata collection; no logs, tracking, or identifiers

• Peer-to-peer communication through temporary invite links

• Fully open-source with a custom, self-contained protocol

Pros

• Maximum anonymity with no identity exposure

• No central server logs or third-party data access

• Fully encrypted, peer-to-peer messaging experience

• Ideal for advanced users in high-risk or surveillance-heavy environments

• 100% free and maintained by a privacy-focused community

Cons

• Limited functionality, primarily for 1:1 chats and basic group messaging

• No support for public channels, bots, or large-scale communities

Pricing & Rating

SimpleX Chat is completely free and open-source. There are no premium tiers, subscriptions, or hidden fees.

13. Mattermost

*Image from Mattermost

Mattermost is a powerful, open-source platform built for organizations that prioritize data sovereignty and infrastructure control. Designed to mirror the user experience of Slack, complete with channels, threads, and integrations, it offers on-premise deployment and enterprise-grade compliance.

Unlike Telegram’s cloud-centric model, Mattermost empowers teams in regulated industries to maintain full control over their communication environment.

Key Features

• Self-hosted deployment for total control over data and access

• Slack-style channels and threaded messaging for structured collaboration

• Enterprise-level compliance and security frameworks

• Fully open-source with developer flexibility and DevOps tooling

• Extensive integrations and workflow automation via plugins and APIs

Pros

• No dependence on third-party cloud infrastructure

• Compliant with strict legal, IT, and regulatory requirements

• Familiar Slack-style interface simplifies team onboarding

• Scales easily across secure, large-team environments

• Backed by a strong open-source and DevOps community

Cons

• Requires internal hosting, setup, and ongoing technical maintenance

• Less intuitive for non-technical or small teams without IT support

• Some advanced features are reserved for enterprise-tier plans

Pricing & Rating

14. Briar

*Image from Briar

Briar is a decentralized, privacy-first messaging app designed for secure communication in environments with censorship, surveillance, or limited connectivity.

Unlike Telegram’s cloud-based infrastructure, Briar operates entirely peer-to-peer, using Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or Tor to sync messages without requiring the internet or central servers. It stores all data locally and is purpose-built for activists, journalists, and users in high-risk regions.

Key Features

• Offline messaging using Bluetooth or local Wi-Fi networks

• Peer-to-peer syncing with optional Tor routing for anonymity

• No cloud or central server; messages stay on your device

• Secure blogging and forums that work offline

Pros

• Fully functional without internet or mobile networks

• Resistant to censorship, surveillance, and takedowns

• All data is stored locally; no exposure to third-party servers

• Tailored for crisis response, protests, and restricted regions

• Lightweight protocol designed for low power consumption

Cons

• Limited usability for casual or everyday messaging

• Lacks media-rich features and a modern, polished interface

Pricing & Rating

15. Olvid

*Image from Olvid

Olvid is a next-generation secure messaging app that provides mathematically verified end-to-end encryption, without relying on servers or storing metadata. Certified by France’s national cybersecurity agency (ANSSI), Olvid sets a new standard for cryptographic trust.

Unlike Telegram, which still relies on server infrastructure and partial encryption, Olvid is purpose-built for high-trust, sensitive communications where privacy is non-negotiable.

Key Features

• ANSSI-certified encryption for maximum security assurance

• Serverless trust model with zero metadata collection

• No message logs or data retention; everything stays local

• Purpose-built for secure professional and government use

Pros

• Cryptographically verified end-to-end encryption

• No trusted server requirement; true peer-to-peer model

• Zero user tracking, profiling, or metadata leaks

• Government-grade certification for sensitive communications

• Ideal for legal, defense, medical, and high-security environments

Cons

• No support for public groups, communities, or broadcast channels

• Smaller user base, with advanced features behind a paywall

Pricing & Rating

Why Look Beyond Telegram in 2025?

Telegram is a free, fast, and feature-rich platform for group chats, media sharing, and bots. It syncs across devices and supports large public channels.

But its one-size-fits-all design lacks essentials for secure or structured communication. End-to-end encryption isn’t the default, metadata is stored, and large groups become hard to manage without roles or moderation tools.

Free tools such as 8seats, Discord, and Signal each provide tailored value for distinct use cases, from secure messaging to asynchronous workflows. Meanwhile, paid alternatives deliver advanced features, stronger compliance, and dedicated support that Telegram’s generic setup lacks.

What Should You Look for in Your Ideal Telegram Alternative?

Not every messaging app solves the same problems. Choosing the right tool depends on what Telegram lacks for your specific needs, whether that’s stronger encryption, better group management, or cleaner workflows.

Here’s how to evaluate the best apps like Telegram in 2025:

• Core Differentiator: Solves a Telegram pain point like privacy, structure, or async clarity

• Privacy Model: Goes beyond E2EE, considers metadata, server control, and data transparency

• Usability & Learning Curve: Matches or improves on Telegram’s speed and simplicity

• Feature Set for Your Need: Supports your use case, work, community, family, or activism

• Scalability & Group Management: Handles large groups with roles, moderation, and thread tools

• Pricing & Value: Offers enough ROI to justify switching from Telegram’s free baseline

• Ecosystem & Integrations: Syncs well with tools you already use (e.g., Slack, GitHub, Zoom)

Use these factors to match features with function and find a platform built for how and why you communicate.

FAQs About Choosing a Telegram Alternative

What is the most secure alternative to Telegram?

Signal is the most secure alternative to Telegram. It uses open-source, audited encryption, stores no metadata, and enables default end-to-end encryption, unlike Telegram, which encrypts only secret chats and retains IP logs.

Is WhatsApp more private than Telegram?

No, WhatsApp is not more private than Telegram. While both offer encryption, WhatsApp collects more metadata. Telegram stores messages in the cloud, but retains less behavioral tracking.

Which Telegram alternative is best for large communities?

Discord is the best Telegram alternative for large communities. It supports scalable servers, role-based moderation, and persistent channels, features that Telegram lacks beyond basic admin tools and pinned messages.

Are there any open-source Telegram alternatives?

Yes, there are open-source Telegram alternatives. Signal, Element (Matrix), Wire, Mattermost, and Briar all offer source code transparency, enabling independent audits and greater trust in their privacy architecture.

What is the best free alternative to Telegram?

Signal is the best free alternative to Telegram. It offers full privacy, zero cost, no ads, and no data tracking. Unlike Telegram, Signal encrypts all chats by default and doesn’t store user metadata.

Which Telegram Alternative Is Right for You in 2025?

The best Telegram-like app depends on your priorities, privacy, team structure, community management, and secure hosting. Each platform offers a distinct advantage, whether you're managing a remote team, building a community, or seeking full encryption.

“If privacy is your top priority, consider using Signal or Threema.

If you need structure for teams, try 8seats or Slack.

For large communities, Discord or Element is the strongest option.”

Explore each platform above and select the one that best suits your communication needs.